Our suite of products has been developed with the aim to offer solutions in the field of sports performance analysis for all performance levels and budgets.
Try it free our products - Download now
Have a question or issue? Our team will give you answers. Take a look into our videocenter, helpcenter or FAQs section.
Select your program and find the playlist with video tutorials we’ve made for you.
Here you will find answers to most common questions you can have.
Nacsport software has been created as a sports video analysis...
Read more
Yes, you can. But must read this info first. Nacsport’s video analysis...
Read more
If you want to test the software you can download a full version...
Read more
Do you need contact with our support team? - Request support
By Luismi Loro
03-November-2020 on Analysis
7 minute readThere were a lot of high expectations going into this match. Although neither has had the best start to the season and both currently sit mid-table, this was a clash between two attractive teams with world class players and managers with tactical success.
In the end, our expectations were not entirely met.
United took to the field with an attacking formation of 4-3-1-2 with Bruno Fernandes taking point at the forefront of the midfield diamond. This formation occasionally warped into a 4-3-3, especially when pressuring Arsenal in their own half.
Superiority at the back. 5 vs 3 to Man United
A game within a game. 6 vs 5 in this zone
United in the low block. 4-3-1-2 / 4-3-3
In attack, Man United had great problems trying to overcome Arsenal’s middle block and, despite the occasional breakthrough, they found it difficult to progress. They only really posed danger in fast attacks linked to Rashford and Greenwood.
Elneny chasing Bruno, being pulled out of position and freeing up Rashford
Quick attack, pulling defense out of position
In defence, United suffered out wide, especially when Arsenal launched a counter from midfield and quickly played the ball out wide, bypassing the central defenders and looking for a 2v1 against a winger. These situations were where the Gunners had their best chances.
Arsenal attack 2 vs 1 up the United wing
For their part, Arsenal squared up in 4-4-3 that sometimes mutated into a 4-4-2 depending on the movements of Aubameyang and Saka. When keeping Aubameyang open, Saka came inside with Partey and Elneny to form the 4-3-3.
Arsenal with a dangerous counter attack
However, when Saka went high and wide, Aubameyang cut inside and paired up with Lacazette as a second striker.
Arsenal attack 4-4-2 / 4-3-3 with Aubameyang and Saka interchanging on the outside and in
Off the ball, Arsenal applied high pressure with Elneny paying special attention containing Bruno Fernandes. This made life very difficult for their opponents. In the upper middle block they stood at 3-4-1-2 or 3-4-3 depending on the positioning of Lacazette who sometimes stayed up mixing it up with Man U’s back line. The two wingmen, Willian and Aubameyang dropped back and inside to shore up the midfield. And the wing backs, Saka and Bellerín, pushed up to fill the gaps.
Low / middle block. Arsenal in 3-4-1-2
Bruno pulling away from Elneny and generating space
In the low block, they played a 5-2-3 which sometimes transformed into a 5-4-1 when Aubameyang and Willian dropped back to support.
Low block- 5-2-3 / 5-4-1
Throughout the entirety of the 90 minutes, both teams were evenly matched. Very few chances were afforded to either team during the first half. In the second half, United dominated a little more on the attack but still could not generate many scoring opportunities.
Arsenal accepted the counter attacking role and, despite having very few chances in the 2nd half, won a penalty after a play down the wing (where United suffered most) ended with Pogba bringing down Bellerín in the box. Aubayemang converted and this proved to be the decisive factor in a poor game.
Substitutions did nothing to change the flow of the match and, in the last minutes, Arsenal defended extremely well against a United side desperate to even up the game. There were many crosses into the box and set-pieces utilised but all to no avail.
• The game was fast paced and intense but there was a lack of football being played.
• Neither team was able to dominate and impose their style.
• Goal scoring opportunities were scarce and, in the end, it was an Arsenal penalty that separated the two.
• Overall, there was too much respect and a fear of losing in an important match that would help each team climb the league.
03-05-2023 Written by Hernán Romero Carpio
8 minute read Read more...
03-05-2023 Written by Matías Navarro García
9 minute read Read more...
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a monthly compilation of articles, interviews and Nacsport tips for video analysis.
Once a month, we'll send a compendium of our best articles, interview and advice, straight to your inbox. Enjoy!
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a monthly compilation of articles, interviews and Nacsport tips for video analysis.
Once a month, we'll send a compendium of our best articles, interview and advice, straight to your inbox. Enjoy!
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a monthly compilation of articles, interviews and Nacsport tips for video analysis.
Once a month, we'll send a compendium of our best articles, interview and advice, straight to your inbox. Enjoy!
Select your language: